I learned a long time ago that the same word(s) mean different things to different people and I "ain't gonna change them" with my meaning.
Ahem. I beg to differ :biggrin:
I was taught that when meaning matters, it is necessary to "Operationally define" the terms being used for the foundation of the discussion.
Thus, one might define a specific color using the Pantone Matching System (PMS) and everyone would know what shade of green Pantone 7725 U is.
Meanings do change and that's why, I believe, the terms must be defined so we can agree what they mean in the context of the user(s) on this forum.
So, when someone starts a thread about a term like "Quality" and they also define the term, in that specific thread, that's the meaning which should be discussed unless they're asking for a debate about their definition.
But, if they want to define the term for all threads on the IAP, they're going to have a lot of discussion, disagreement, and they'll likely have to sell a lot of Girl Scout Cookies to make it stick. :biggrin::biggrin:
I agree with you that it would be great, its just that the masses will not read or adopt the defined. You mentioned Pantone, and that is a great standard for defining, however in the case here we are not under any authority that makes people conform to a norm, and besides that gray here is not gray somewhere else. They use "grey" and they are right.
There is a HUGE difference when you work for a company or organization that can fire you (clients drop out) if you don't conform to standards versus being in a community that features the differences and individuality. When people don't have to change wording they won't.
Colonel is pronounced kur - nal. Why? because the educated and organized of England chose to name the leader of a column "colonel" and on documents over the years wrote it as "colonel". However, the masses of the people kept using the spoken word that was previously used which was "kurnel". Over the course of a century, Colonel was spoken phonetically as kurnel.
You can't change some events with "orders" or "awareness" only. That can only be accomplished through their "values" system.
In your "beg to differ" you added a value that will cause change, and that value is - that they can get fired or client will quit if a standard is not conformed to. (Sorry for ending with a preposition.) People will value their jobs, so they will conform most of the time or quit or get fired.
On this forum there is no incentive values to change what people have been holding onto for most of their life. I will not change mine, as I value precious metal content in the basis for determining what quality is. And this is not a company that will fire me so, no that won't work for me, nor will it (IMHO) change others.
IF people want to find a standard to conform to voluntarily, there needs to be a common value presented for them to want to do it.
One other thing I learned a long time ago: In voluntary situations - You can't change most people's lives by arguing truths and standards, - you only push most people away doing that. You have a MUCH better chance at changing them through their value system - i.e. what they value.
When you work in an "industry" and are under authority, that is a different story!
NOW, If Smitty were to propose a kind of standard so that we could all be on the same page, - that is a value to come together. To throw it out for discussion and opinion, that is an argument, which is usually divisive, as if we didn't already know.