Wondering about the distinguishing characteristics of Rhinoplastic and Inlace Acrylester.
I have used both of these successfully but don't remember anything particularly distinguishing other than that both are very hard and require care in turning ... both prone to chipping particularly in the early stages of turning a square cross-section to round. . After that, with light cuts, both produce nice pens fairly readily.
They both polish up beautifully, resulting in gorgeous pens.
I know that the world of "plastics" is vast, and I know virtually nothing about the varieties of materials that get lumped under this term.
Would appreciate comments comparing and contrasting these two materials, please.
I have used both of these successfully but don't remember anything particularly distinguishing other than that both are very hard and require care in turning ... both prone to chipping particularly in the early stages of turning a square cross-section to round. . After that, with light cuts, both produce nice pens fairly readily.
They both polish up beautifully, resulting in gorgeous pens.
I know that the world of "plastics" is vast, and I know virtually nothing about the varieties of materials that get lumped under this term.
Would appreciate comments comparing and contrasting these two materials, please.
Last edited: