The vendor is also responsible to provide instructions. Once they decide to sell conversion kits or sell the pen as a convertible they tell the end user how to do it. or at least warn the end user of any likely problems the might encounter. People don't call them hybrid because that's not what they are. Calling them convertible rather than hybrid in no way degrades them. They are from what I've seen a pretty good pen kit. I'm curious PM me the 4th US vendor ... you know which 3 I know about.
Going to drop it here. You are giving the vendor to much credit as you are biased in the matter, not only as a vendor
but compelled to attempt to lure me into deceptive traits to argue with you. However I am not doing that. I stated the case and it really does not matter who is right or wrong. What does matter is the USER HAS CHOICE. Some refer to it as freedom.
Sorry no PM with you or the like. I have no intentions of listing and of the 4 vendors either.
Ed you were the instigator of the discussion between us....not me. You made a statement saying I was wrong, knowing full well that I wouldn't be likely to let it pass unanswered.
I didn't give the vendor either credit or blame, I stated a responsibility that I believe most vendors here at IAP would agree they have.
What on God's little green earth is that supposed to mean --- what are "deceptive traits"?
No one in this thread, ever said or implied that the end user did not have a choice. That was never in doubt.
This thread was about an end user who encountered a problem when he exercised that choice and how to avoid that problem in the future. Since several end users had the problem it does fall on the vendor to find the cure. I think all of the vendors here would agree with that.
I have no more bias because I am a vendor than you have because you are not.