Randy_
Member
There is a current IAP thread where someone expressed an opinion that cross-posting was objectionable and even suggested that netiquette identified it as such......but I wonder??
Seems to me some subjects are important enough that the poster would like to see them reach as large an audience as possible, even if it means cross-posting. One could also argue that "ANY" topic important enough to post on a forum should receive as wide a distribution as possible to interested parties with the exception of topics specific to a particular site.
Personally, I don't object to most cross-posts and feel the idea of netiquette is one of flexible guidelines rather than "written-in-stone" laws. For instance, on the East coast where I grew up, wearing a hat in the house or at the dinner table or many other places was considered inappropriate. Here in Texas, however, a lot of folks have a hat glued to their head except when taking a shower or sleeping!! So just because the Emily Post of netiquette says cross-posting is bad, maybe it ain't so??
What do you think??
Cross-posting is:
Seems to me some subjects are important enough that the poster would like to see them reach as large an audience as possible, even if it means cross-posting. One could also argue that "ANY" topic important enough to post on a forum should receive as wide a distribution as possible to interested parties with the exception of topics specific to a particular site.
Personally, I don't object to most cross-posts and feel the idea of netiquette is one of flexible guidelines rather than "written-in-stone" laws. For instance, on the East coast where I grew up, wearing a hat in the house or at the dinner table or many other places was considered inappropriate. Here in Texas, however, a lot of folks have a hat glued to their head except when taking a shower or sleeping!! So just because the Emily Post of netiquette says cross-posting is bad, maybe it ain't so??
What do you think??
Cross-posting is: