Randy_
Member
Originally posted by gerryr
<br />I think Dario is correct in starting this, if he hadn't someone else probably would, like me. The topic that caused this was locked, <b>so there was no way to discuss what went on</b>, other than start a new topic.....
Seems like both you and Dario missed the point, Gerry!! The thread was locked precisely because the administrators determined that the discussion was or would become disruptive and they "WANTED" it discontinued. You will remember that a mod even politely asked for members to limit the discussion to the original topic...a pen blank...and quit mad-mouthing the mods and their decisions. And you will also remember that the request was ignored by a few individuals who felt they were above the rules.
On some forums I frequent, there are explicitly stated rules that reopening discussions in locked threads is forbidden and violators are subject to immediate banning and on many other forums it is an accepted if unwritten expression of respect for the decisions of the moderating staff to let sleeping dogs lie.
IMO, Jeff has shown remarkable restraint and tolerance for a questionable decision by Dario and suspect that it was a coin toss as to whether or not this thread should be locked and some private warning issued and I suspect that Dario probably got the benefit of the doubt because he is a well respected member of IAP.
In retrospect, I will acknowledge that this thread has produced some good discussion and members have been reasonably well behaved. That fact, however, does not change my opinion that reopening the discussions in locked threads is discourteous and disrespectful of the decisions of the moderating staff. I don't know that this wasn't done, but I think that the only circumstance under which a locked thread should receive a second hearing is after a "PRIVATE" request to the administration is made and granted for permission to do so.