Florida Marine
Member
http://www.military.com/news/article/poll-marines-most-prestigious-branch.html?col=1186032325324
but, damn...its hard to be humble :biggrin:
but, damn...its hard to be humble :biggrin:
Of course you know what "Marine" stands for. My a-- rides in Navy equipment. :biggrin:
Now that I have retired from the Corps, my a-- rides in civilian taxis, but you guys sure did keep your cabs cleaner. (Your chow was better too):wink: Thanks for the rides...Semper FiOf course you know what "Marine" stands for. My a-- rides in Navy equipment. :biggrin:
Does Cav know you feel this way about him?????:biggrin:FIRST CAV ALL THE WAY! If you aint Cav, you aint S*&T! Go Army!:biggrin:
Does Cav know you feel this way about him?????:biggrin:FIRST CAV ALL THE WAY! If you aint Cav, you aint S*&T! Go Army!:biggrin:
Top Gun with Tom Cruise.:biggrin:.
BUT I am putting a survey to the forum, name a movie that is dedicated directly to the reputation of the Air Force that someone in the Air Force would be proud to say represented their service. I presented this question to my office and the other major joint service office here at the embassy and so far there true has only been one and that one VERY OLD.
Marines, Army and Navy all have classics and newer movies helping raise their reputations.
So far officer and enlisted here have put the big DENIED on movies like "Iron Eagle"(Series), Iron Man (air force were supporting roles, not main story line), Transformers (contended for awhile until it was pointed out this was joint service and as supporting to the story).
I served proud as an Army MP (yea yea here comes the boos and trash) I met people from all 4 branches excluding the SEALs, Rangers and Special Forces all of the Marines I met were crazy SOBs.And I mean it from the bottom of my heart too, great group but they were nuts! I will say though, it was kinda fun to see how red a Gunny Sgt. could get after telling him he needed to step away from the fence line as the gates were not open yet. (ahh the simple pleasures of being an E-4 with a badge:biggrin::biggrin
![]()
Top Gun with Tom Cruise.:biggrin:.
BUT I am putting a survey to the forum, name a movie that is dedicated directly to the reputation of the Air Force that someone in the Air Force would be proud to say represented their service. I presented this question to my office and the other major joint service office here at the embassy and so far there true has only been one and that one VERY OLD.
Marines, Army and Navy all have classics and newer movies helping raise their reputations.
So far officer and enlisted here have put the big DENIED on movies like "Iron Eagle"(Series), Iron Man (air force were supporting roles, not main story line), Transformers (contended for awhile until it was pointed out this was joint service and as supporting to the story).
This poll is not scientific and reflects the opinions of only those Internet users who have chosen to participate.
Top Gun with Tom Cruise.:biggrin:.
BUT I am putting a survey to the forum, name a movie that is dedicated directly to the reputation of the Air Force that someone in the Air Force would be proud to say represented their service. I presented this question to my office and the other major joint service office here at the embassy and so far there true has only been one and that one VERY OLD.
Marines, Army and Navy all have classics and newer movies helping raise their reputations.
So far officer and enlisted here have put the big DENIED on movies like "Iron Eagle"(Series), Iron Man (air force were supporting roles, not main story line), Transformers (contended for awhile until it was pointed out this was joint service and as supporting to the story).
The only branch of the armed forces that deserves respect is the United States Armed Forces, all FIVE branches! Any one, man, woman or child, that dons one of those uniforms deserves all our undying respect, regardless of the branch of the magnificent tree!
I was never allowed entry into their midst, medical reasons. But I am proud of them all and give thanks for their sacrifice and extremely difficult work. They deserve much better than we give them. I am proud to have been able to build a few pens for Gary McG to send to our troops. I hope the chance to do it again is offered.
Charles
CG is not under the Department of Transportation any more, they are now under Homeland Security. My son has been in 5 years now and plans to make his 20 there. He is currently stationed in Wilmington, NC and is assigned to the USCGC Diligence.As the parent of a Retired Coast Guard Officer... Except in the case of declared war, the US Coast Guard is a search & rescue and law enforcement branch connected to the Department of Transportation. In time of declared war they would become attached to the US Navy.
My son, while on active duty with the USCG, did serve on a US Navy Frigate home ported first in Japan the Longbeach for 2 years in an exchange program of some kind. Of his 5 years service 4 were sea duty - and on deep water.
I don't know why this thread is about women, but since you brought it up, it should be noted that there are plenty of WMs in harms way. Just because women cannot yet be 'infantry', doesn't mean that they are not out there taking fire.My personal belief is that there is no place for women in combat and no place for women on Navy fighting ships. The Marine Corps still understands that.
I don't know why this thread is about women, but since you brought it up, it should be noted that there are plenty of WMs in harms way. Just because women cannot yet be 'infantry', doesn't mean that they are not out there taking fire.My personal belief is that there is no place for women in combat and no place for women on Navy fighting ships. The Marine Corps still understands that.
That being said, I can't think of a single reason to bar women from serving in a combat position, if they choose those MOSs.
I don't understand why it's OK for men, but not for women. Seems kinda sexist, to me.I don't know why this thread is about women, but since you brought it up, it should be noted that there are plenty of WMs in harms way. Just because women cannot yet be 'infantry', doesn't mean that they are not out there taking fire.My personal belief is that there is no place for women in combat and no place for women on Navy fighting ships. The Marine Corps still understands that.
That being said, I can't think of a single reason to bar women from serving in a combat position, if they choose those MOSs.
I clearly said it was a personal belief really don't care if anyone agrees or not. I mentioned it because although I am a Navy Vet I admire the Marine Corps more than the Navy today and that is one of the reasons.
I just don't think our nation should send young women, including young mothers, out to get shot or blown up (even if they want to volunteer). I think we are better served leaving that to men.
I don't understand why it's OK for men, but not for women. Seems kinda sexist, to me.I don't know why this thread is about women, but since you brought it up, it should be noted that there are plenty of WMs in harms way. Just because women cannot yet be 'infantry', doesn't mean that they are not out there taking fire.My personal belief is that there is no place for women in combat and no place for women on Navy fighting ships. The Marine Corps still understands that.
That being said, I can't think of a single reason to bar women from serving in a combat position, if they choose those MOSs.
I clearly said it was a personal belief really don't care if anyone agrees or not. I mentioned it because although I am a Navy Vet I admire the Marine Corps more than the Navy today and that is one of the reasons.
I just don't think our nation should send young women, including young mothers, out to get shot or blown up (even if they want to volunteer). I think we are better served leaving that to men.
That being said, if you had given a 'unit cohesion' or 'sexual tension' argument, I'd have loved to discuss the issue further. A 'women should be home making babies while the big strong man goes and fights' argument is not one that deserves debate, however.