I am not an expert pen turner (only done hundreds, not thousands like many of the guys here) but I have made furniture and cabinetry for 30 years and I can tell you if a person will pay $300 for a stickley chair with lots of distress that typifies that it is 125 years old - they will pay a $1,200 for the same chair in "new old stock" condition. So I personally would err on the side of less distress and more "shine" for any project.
Also I think getting opinions from laypeople is of value. After I had been turning pens for a few years - my girlfriend one day says "hey I forgot, I once received a wood pen as a gift" - after digging through a couple of old boxes she produced her wood pen - it was 15 years old - very well made and shaped BUT very uninspiring - it was light wood (Walnut sapwood) and had been finished with a friction finish (or wax or oil) - she said she stopped using it because it had gotten "dingy, and drab"
I myself hate CA finish not because of look or feel but because of numerous flaws that can happen in application -love lacquer but its very expensive ---- But I am always hesitant of any oil, wax, or friction finish that will disappear in 4-6 years and leave a drab dingy pen in the bottom of a box - my hope for all my pens is that they will sit on someone's desk like mine right, between my 1937 lever fill Sheaffer pen and my 1965 Parker 51 (both old pens have been buffed to look a shinny as possible)
I think the dark oily woods like cocobollo probably do better with the low sheen, worn look than light woods like you have - Oh and for those of you that like distressed old looking pens I have dozens of blanks with foggy or white spots in the CA finish I will sell very cheap
Oh and I agree with Mark James - my vote -knock down the sheen on a CA, Shellac, or lacquer finish