I own two skews. One is a small 1/2" one with a square profile I inherited for free. It has been well used, and is very short. I don't know its brand or provenance. I can't sharpen it easily anymore, because the remaining steel coming out of the handle is so short it doesn't get over my grinder platform.
The other is a 3/4" Benjamin's Best oval skew. I can sharpen it okay with my EasyGrind system that has that offset tool handle base holder to get the proper angle for sharpening either side of the skew. But I can only sharpen it with a straight grind, there's no good way to get a radiused grind. Besides that, I find when I use it for peeling cuts, it dulls quickly. I assume this is to be expected from a budget, entry-level skew like this.
After recently spending quite a bit of time with both skews practicing my planing cuts, rolling beads, etc. etc. I think I'm ready to invest in one that's a bit nicer. I think a 1" makes sense, the 3/4" is a bit small for some of the spatulas and pepper grinders I've been turning lately. I also think I want to get one with a heavier cross section, made from square bar stock that I can rest on my grinder platform and sharpen with a radius. And of course, better steel.
These four options are available to me locally:
Cryotek - $67
Henry Taylor - $79
Robert Sorby - $94
Robust - $99
The Robust one is nitrided and has all sorts of technical claims about increased hardness and holding an edge longer than M2 HSS, though it also doesn't come with a handle (a fixable problem). Henry Taylor and Robert Sorby are both recognized brand names, but claim nothing beyond being M2 HSS. The CryoTek appears to be M2 HSS that has undergone a cold treatment that will apparently make it hold an edge longer. All of them except the Sorby come with the radiused cutting edge I want, so I'd have to regrind the Sorby myself.
So am I paying for a brand name with the Taylor/Sorby options? Is Cryotek steel inferior to Taylor/Sorby despite its cold treatment? Is the Robust tool really $32 better than the Cryotek? Trying to figure out if there's any meaningful difference between them that would cause me to want to spring for the Sorby over the Cryotek, for instance.
The other is a 3/4" Benjamin's Best oval skew. I can sharpen it okay with my EasyGrind system that has that offset tool handle base holder to get the proper angle for sharpening either side of the skew. But I can only sharpen it with a straight grind, there's no good way to get a radiused grind. Besides that, I find when I use it for peeling cuts, it dulls quickly. I assume this is to be expected from a budget, entry-level skew like this.
After recently spending quite a bit of time with both skews practicing my planing cuts, rolling beads, etc. etc. I think I'm ready to invest in one that's a bit nicer. I think a 1" makes sense, the 3/4" is a bit small for some of the spatulas and pepper grinders I've been turning lately. I also think I want to get one with a heavier cross section, made from square bar stock that I can rest on my grinder platform and sharpen with a radius. And of course, better steel.
These four options are available to me locally:
Cryotek - $67
Henry Taylor - $79
Robert Sorby - $94
Robust - $99
The Robust one is nitrided and has all sorts of technical claims about increased hardness and holding an edge longer than M2 HSS, though it also doesn't come with a handle (a fixable problem). Henry Taylor and Robert Sorby are both recognized brand names, but claim nothing beyond being M2 HSS. The CryoTek appears to be M2 HSS that has undergone a cold treatment that will apparently make it hold an edge longer. All of them except the Sorby come with the radiused cutting edge I want, so I'd have to regrind the Sorby myself.
So am I paying for a brand name with the Taylor/Sorby options? Is Cryotek steel inferior to Taylor/Sorby despite its cold treatment? Is the Robust tool really $32 better than the Cryotek? Trying to figure out if there's any meaningful difference between them that would cause me to want to spring for the Sorby over the Cryotek, for instance.