You are essentially putting a CA finish over a sanding sealer, and you can expect the same risks as when doing that.
Most people use sanding sealers that are a lacquer with a lubricant added to them so you can sand without the lacquer balling up on the sandpaper. A sanding sealer is intended to be sanded back to the bare wood so it is IN the wood, not ON the wood. Read the directions on the can. That is why the lubricant is there.
A lot of people use the sanding sealer to build up a heavy film finish before they apply another finish on top of it, and some are using the sanding sealer as the finish. However, a lot of those are wondering why they are having problems with their CA finishes. In the first case, nothing sticks to lacquer very well, except more lacquer which melts into the previous surface. In the later, the lubricant in the sanding sealer makes it into a very soft finish that can be polished to a high shine, but is too soft to wear very well. There folks would be better off with a shellac friction polish because it is harder than the sanding sealer.
So, consider your lacquer as a grain filler and wood sealer, and do what Redfish said - sand it back to bare wood. Then apply the CA finish. There is no benefit to leaving the thick lacquer film under the CA, and you can have a lot of problens with it. The coating of CA will effectively destroy all of the transparent and reflective qualities of the lacquer, so there is nothing there to save.
There are shellac based sealers available, or you can use pure shellac. It sands quite easilly. CA, and all other finishes, stick quite well to shellac. You can apply the CA over a film of shellac on the wood and expect it to stay there, but not so with lacquer.