Munsterlander
Member
I originally posted this under "To BLO or not to BLO" but since it's kind of a different question I thought maybe it would be better to start a new topic. Here's the original post:
I haven't yet gotten up the nerve to try the CA/BLO finish (will soon), so far I've been using EEE, then Myland's sanding sealer (I know, why EEE _and_ Myland's sanding sealer - it just seems to work better for me...), then Myland's friction polish, then wax. I am making a pen using desert ironwood for a friend that is just here this weekend (and I don't want to try out CA/BLO for the first time on that), but wondered if it would be OK to use some BLO to get the pop but under the friction polish instead of CA. Paul's May 19th post got me thinking about it - so I'm thinking BLO then my normal process. Is this OK? Crazy? Thanks.
I haven't yet gotten up the nerve to try the CA/BLO finish (will soon), so far I've been using EEE, then Myland's sanding sealer (I know, why EEE _and_ Myland's sanding sealer - it just seems to work better for me...), then Myland's friction polish, then wax. I am making a pen using desert ironwood for a friend that is just here this weekend (and I don't want to try out CA/BLO for the first time on that), but wondered if it would be OK to use some BLO to get the pop but under the friction polish instead of CA. Paul's May 19th post got me thinking about it - so I'm thinking BLO then my normal process. Is this OK? Crazy? Thanks.