We have a lot of discussions regarding copying - I have not gone around to check, but I would imagine that every hobby forum where things are made by the hobbiest has similar discussions. While not encouraging or condoning the practice here is my take.
1. Copying is human nature - it is engrained in our genes (in my opinion). Human babiess learn to walk, talk and almost everything else we do by copying.
2. We encourage copying - humans have entire industries that are built on 'copying' whatever sells. Let someone 'invent' a new toy for instance.
3. Copying does have a negative impact on invention - that was discovered long ago and gave rise to patents - but even patents have always had time limits after which we not only say it is OK to copy but we actually encourage it. Generic drugs are an example - and I am personally very happy that they are a load cheaper than the originals.
4. Art and architecture seem to have been copied since they first appeared. Often one or more of the copies is all that have survived. Who knows who built the first pyramid? But, we do know that quite a few of them were built. Today there are 'forgers' of art that are as well known as the originators and their work has become quite valuable.
5. There has always been some conflict over what constitutes enough change to an old idea to make it a 'new' idea. A history of Thomas Edison's patents makes clear the answer is - not much. At least at that time, the rules have since changed. But, the conflict continues. We discuss it often here.
What I am trying to convey here is that copying what works is a normal human activity and will always be with us. In general, that's good, its the way we learn. But, it will always leave us with a debate over the ethics of copies of specific items...a debate that will never be settled.
1. Copying is human nature - it is engrained in our genes (in my opinion). Human babiess learn to walk, talk and almost everything else we do by copying.
2. We encourage copying - humans have entire industries that are built on 'copying' whatever sells. Let someone 'invent' a new toy for instance.
3. Copying does have a negative impact on invention - that was discovered long ago and gave rise to patents - but even patents have always had time limits after which we not only say it is OK to copy but we actually encourage it. Generic drugs are an example - and I am personally very happy that they are a load cheaper than the originals.
4. Art and architecture seem to have been copied since they first appeared. Often one or more of the copies is all that have survived. Who knows who built the first pyramid? But, we do know that quite a few of them were built. Today there are 'forgers' of art that are as well known as the originators and their work has become quite valuable.
5. There has always been some conflict over what constitutes enough change to an old idea to make it a 'new' idea. A history of Thomas Edison's patents makes clear the answer is - not much. At least at that time, the rules have since changed. But, the conflict continues. We discuss it often here.
What I am trying to convey here is that copying what works is a normal human activity and will always be with us. In general, that's good, its the way we learn. But, it will always leave us with a debate over the ethics of copies of specific items...a debate that will never be settled.