glenspens
Member
Who workes for the Federal Gov and starting today may gets more time to do some turning and work on them honey DO list.... 
This can get messy.
This can get messy.
Lets keep politics out of this and it won't:biggrin:
my son works at the smithsonian and my daughter in law works at the census bureau their looking for a small break as a vacation.
my son works at the smithsonian and my daughter in law works at the census bureau their looking for a small break as a vacation.
She is at home expanding the HONEY-DO list!
When this happened back in the 90's, everyone eventually got their back pay (several months down the road). Unfortunately, this time it isn't going to happen, so I hope those who are missing days have planned for the future and saved up their pennies.A question for "older" Federal employees: Have any of these shutdowns (there have been 17 since Reagan) EVER resulted in you losing a day's pay? My recollection is that they ALWAYS pay everyone for the days missed. But I am NOT a federal employee, so I wonder if this is just the news media's choice of reporting.
Don't go to the bank that it won't - there is nothing in place that I've heard of that might prevent it.When this happened back in the 90's, everyone eventually got their back pay (several months down the road). Unfortunately, this time it isn't going to happen, so I hope those who are missing days have planned for the future and saved up their pennies.A question for "older" Federal employees: Have any of these shutdowns (there have been 17 since Reagan) EVER resulted in you losing a day's pay? My recollection is that they ALWAYS pay everyone for the days missed. But I am NOT a federal employee, so I wonder if this is just the news media's choice of reporting.
SWMBO decided she was going to do some shopping after turning in her slip. Yeah, 'cause that makes sense... they're not paying you, so let's go spend some money instead :-/
actually i heard, not 100% sure, that they have passed a separate bill that the laid off employees will get there back pay when restarted. that to me is ridiculous. if they are shut down, not working and we cant go to the parks etc, why will they get paid for that when they go back.
as response to your analogy...the building I work in had a fire in it 3 years ago. Our office was closed down for 3 days due to the fire and the needed smoke remediation. I was still on-call as needed for clients and jobsite visits. We were still paid for the time we were "sent home" - though we noted that time separately on our timesheets so that the company would be reimbursed through the "business interruption" insurance. We kept track of all time we were not able to work until the building cleanup was 100% complete, which took several weeks.actually i heard, not 100% sure, that they have passed a separate bill that the laid off employees will get there back pay when restarted. that to me is ridiculous. if they are shut down, not working and we cant go to the parks etc, why will they get paid for that when they go back.
This is also what I have heard. Just wondered if anyone has "first hand" knowledge.
Again, I have no dog in the race. But, the employees are pawns.
As an analogy, if your employer's building burns down tonight, should you get paid for working tomorrow, even though it is clearly impossible? Not the employees' fault that Congress "put them out of work"!
actually i heard, not 100% sure, that they have passed a separate bill that the laid off employees will get there back pay when restarted. that to me is ridiculous. if they are shut down, not working and we cant go to the parks etc, why will they get paid for that when they go back.
This is also what I have heard. Just wondered if anyone has "first hand" knowledge.
Again, I have no dog in the race. But, the employees are pawns.
As an analogy, if your employer's building burns down tonight, should you get paid for working tomorrow, even though it is clearly impossible? Not the employees' fault that Congress "put them out of work"![/quote]
Depends somewhat on what kind of employee you are. I was a salaried employee paid $xxxx.xx per month whether I worked 168 hours (standard work month hours at the company) 40 hours (never happened) or 250 hours (happend now and then). I would have gotten paid in the above situation.
The difference is, the federal employees are laid off. Normally laid off employees (regardless of the reason) don't get paid for the time off. But, Typically when this kind of thing occurs the federal government eventually finds or creates a way to give the the lost pay when the "crisis" is over. Hence they do have the inconvenience of not getting a paycheck and may have to scratch to make ends meet while they're not working but eventually they get the windfall of back pay.
the bill has not been passed yet but was introduced. it is HR 3223 and was introduced on 9/30/2013. it would guarantee employees all back pay no matter what their status. so they will have to suffer through the layoff but get the windfall afterwards. not the way to run the government. they are not working, they should not be paid. not a function of whose fault. they are being paid with our tax dollars.
That bill is continuing their paychecks...I think it doesn't have to do with them losing their pay then getting it back later.Quote:
Originally Posted by cwolfs69![]()
actually i heard, not 100% sure, that they have passed a separate bill that the laid off employees will get there back pay when restarted. that to me is ridiculous. if they are shut down, not working and we cant go to the parks etc, why will they get paid for that when they go back.
This is also what I have heard. Just wondered if anyone has "first hand" knowledge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwolfs69
actually i heard, not 100% sure, that they have passed a separate bill that the laid off employees will get there back pay when restarted. that to me is ridiculous. if they are shut down, not working and we cant go to the parks etc, why will they get paid for that when they go back.
This is also what I have heard. Just wondered if anyone has "first hand" knowledge.
There is no bill like that as far as I know. I'm DOD; there was a bill signed into law last night: HR 3210, applies to pay and allowances of active-duty members, including reservists on full-time active duty, plus pay and allowances for Defense Department and Homeland Security Department civilians and contractors who are determined to be "providing support to members of the armed forces."
Here's a link to the entire article if anyone is interested in reading.
http://www.federaltimes.com/article...down-exemption-military-pay-becomes-law[/FONT]Shutdown exemption for military pay becomes law | Federal Times | federaltimes.com
WOW..... I did not know this was going to blow up like it has or I would not have said anything . i am off as well i work for the army ....i was just making light of the fact that we would have more time in the shop to take our mind off the fact that our pay will be short, my pay just got back to normal from the last furlough.![]()
Here's my question. Since the Federal government is shutting down part of the services they offer, shouldn't our taxes be reduced? In any other enterprise if you choose not to offer some of the products or services that you formerly offered, your revenue is also cut by the amount you garnered from those goods or services.
Just sayin...