Ditto to Mr. Dario's remarks. Most here have experienced a bit of a problem when "trying" to apply a finish to woods that have been treated with Pentacryl. It is apparent the the chemicals used in Pentacryl are not well suited for many finishes at all.
A question, just what are you trying to accomplish by using Pentacryl?
Many here will probably agree with my opinion and advise against using it. There is a GREAT difference in true stabilization processes when compared to Pentacryl. IMHO there is so much difference that I would easily say they are completely different and the use of the word "stabilized" is very misleading. Pentacryl is recommended for preventing the cracking caused by rapid drying of fresh cut GREEN WOOD.
True stabilization of wood makes the wood impervious to just about everything, i.e. oil, water, dirt, etc. Acrylic stabilization impregnates the entire cell structure of the wood with the acrylic resin through and through. Pentacryl impregnates the wood as well, but causes so many problems that I refuse to allow it in my shop.
If you were to hold two pieces of wood in which one was commercially stabilized, and the other treated with Pentacryl, you would instantly see, feel, and smell the difference. I think a better descriptive word to use for wood with Pentacryl would be "treated" and definitely not "stabilized" which denotes, to me at least, that an acrylic resin has been used.
In a few words - I do not like Pentacryl. There is no comparison in the end product of the two processes as they have completely different end results.
GO ACRYLIC STABILIZATION and avoid all the Pentacryl pitfalls. Pentacryl has is place, but not in my place! [

]