Hate to break the news but this is not a Jr Gent.
Hate to break the news but this is not a Jr Gent.
Hate to break the news but this is not a Jr Gent.
http://www.woodturnerscatalog.com/p/1/-/1/2/-/4392/Apprentice-Jr.-Gentlemen's-Pen-Kit
Hate to break the news but this is not a Jr Gent.
I believe they are either JR Gent 1's or the Apprentice Jr. Gents, which are Baron/Navigator Size tubes with slightly different sized top & Bottom Bands.
Hate to break the news but this is not a Jr Gent.
Hate to break the news but this is not a Jr Gent.
Apprentice Jr. Gentlemen's Pen Kit | Pen Making | Craft Supplies USA
Hate to break the news but this is not a Jr Gent.
I believe they are either JR Gent 1's or the Apprentice Jr. Gents, which are Baron/Navigator Size tubes with slightly different sized top & Bottom Bands.
Correct "Jr Gent v1" indicates it's not "Jr Gent" which is implied II. Bushings, tubes and the like are all different with no cross compatibility. Implying "Jr Gent" and using a name of a similar but vastly different product is false advertisement. At least change the name and use something unique.
CSUSA use of 'apprentice' gives it a unique name and therefore not riding the coat tails of the dayacom Gent Jr kit.
Also to prevent confusion something other than "Gent Jr" should be used on these kits.
I'm sorry - but that is the funniest, most absurd thing that I have read in a LONG time.
Thats like saying that you can't call the old volkswagon a Beetle anymore because they made a new version of it.
Correct "Jr Gent v1" indicates it's not "Jr Gent" which is implied II. Bushings, tubes and the like are all different with no cross compatibility. Implying "Jr Gent" and using a name of a similar but vastly different product is false advertisement. At least change the name and use something unique.
CSUSA use of 'apprentice' gives it a unique name and therefore not riding the coat tails of the dayacom Gent Jr kit.
Also to prevent confusion something other than "Gent Jr" should be used on these kits.
I'm sorry - but that is the funniest, most absurd thing that I have read in a LONG time.
Thats like saying that you can't call the old volkswagon a Beetle anymore because they made a new version of it.
The Beetle is still made by the same company, same shape and many of the same features. the 'new' label was for marketing mostly, also to indicate changes and upgrades to it above and beyond the usual year to year changes, unlike in this case. This case is like selling a chevy and calling it a ford.
It was also not posted to be humor but that does indicate a lack of understanding as to the real problem here. Been a great deal of implying threads created, more recently than old, and to many, esp the new turners and the like, there has been some very large amounts of confusion going on. I personally fail to find humor in trying to help reduce or eliminate the confusion this is causing.