Pen Turning Lore I - John Hancock's Signature

Signed-In Members Don't See This Ad

mark james

IAP Collection, Curator
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
12,767
Location
Medina, Ohio
Pen Turning Lore, Myths and Fables - I

John Hancock's Signature

John Hancock, born in 1737 in Massachusetts, inherited a thriving trading business in Boston and would, with Samuel Adams, become a major figure in colonial agitation against British rule. He was also a man of many notable accomplishments:

- He chaired the committee that demanded that British forces leave after The Boston Massacre.
- He served longer as President of The Continental Congress than anyone else.
- He was elected the First Governor of Massachusetts in 1780.
- He was a member of the first pool of candidates for US Presidency.

But John Hancock is also noted for his legendary signature on the Declaration of Independence, but few know the true story of this historical event in US History.

John Hancock was THE FIRST person to sign the Declaration of Independence, and this well known fact is crucial. As most of us are aware, John Hancock's signature is considerably larger than everyone else's with a thick brushstroke that dominates the rest, but the reason for this has been seldom acknowledged.

This is the reason for his trademark signature: John Hancock was also a skilled pen turner and silversmith. Having mastered the dark arts of turning a segmented dip pen topped with a custom silver nib, his achievement was a marked advancement in the progression to todays modern fountain pens.

John Hancock, as the first person to sign the Declaration of Independence, used his own pen with a distinctive nib of his own design, resulting in the large script. But realizing that others also would follow to sign the historic document, and not desiring them to examine his artistry, he slipped his pen into a leather pen vest, and replaced a smaller quill pen in the ink well. As the other delegates followed to sign the document, they commented that it was obvious he used a different pen.

John simply stated:

"While that may be true, I see no disgrace with using the Humble Slimline that was provided…"​

So there you have it folks. A revolutionary segmented dip pen with a custom nib, far ahead of its time produced the historic "John Hancock" signature, while a Humble slimline quill pen scratched out the remaining signatures.

So segmenters, let's get those creative juices flowing for the Segmented Pen Contest.
 
Signed-In Members Don't See This Ad

mark james

IAP Collection, Curator
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
12,767
Location
Medina, Ohio
I love it! And to think they taught us it was because he wanted to be absolutely sure the King could see the signature.

Its amazing the horse feathers that we were taught in the guise of truth. :cool:

Mark, Thanks for this! Seeing that this is Pen Turning Lore I....I look forward to many more!

Good eyes noticing that. Yes, this text has a few more chapters.

I believe this to be a true story:rolleyes:

But I'm still not making segments. :tongue:

Of course its true Chuck; nothing but the truth... And I personally believe every pen turner is a segmenter. Every blank we splatter goes from a solid piece to many smaller pieces.

The 42nd signee was a cousin of mine so I have a particular interest in the document. I have a laser copy on timber that I cherish.

Peter.

Great history then Peter. (My but you look well preserved to have had a cousin in 1776. That Aussie water must be some good stuff!).
 
Last edited:

PenPal

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
2,708
Location
Canberra, A.C.T., Australia.
I love it! And to think they taught us it was because he wanted to be absolutely sure the King could see the signature.

Its amazing the horse feathers that we were taught in the guise of truth. :cool:

Mark, Thanks for this! Seeing that this is Pen Turning Lore I....I look forward to many more!

Good eyes noticing that. Yes, this text has a few more chapters.

I believe this to be a true story:rolleyes:

But I'm still not making segments. :tongue:

Of course its true Chuck; nothing but the truth... And I personally believe every pen turner is a segmenter. Every blank we splatter goes from a solid piece to many smaller pieces.

The 42nd signee was a cousin of mine so I have a particular interest in the document. I have a laser copy on timber that I cherish.

Peter.

Great history then Peter. (My but you look well preserved to have had a cousin in 1776. That Aussie water must be some good stuff!).
He was head hunted to become the 6th President of Princeton University,several cousins in the 1841 & 1846 who emigrated to America. Once a cousin always. Name family this time the wife of the signer,name family in Scotland....Just by the way.

Kind regards Peter.
 
Top Bottom