Religious Signature Lines

Signed-In Members Don't See This Ad

Your opinion on religious quotes in signature lines

  • I think the AUP should be strictly enforced and no religious content should be allowed

    Votes: 37 18.6%
  • I think the AUP needs to be modified to allow religious quotes in signature lines

    Votes: 81 40.7%
  • I think all quotes in signature lines should be eliminated

    Votes: 8 4.0%
  • I don't care one way or another

    Votes: 73 36.7%

  • Total voters
    199
Status
Not open for further replies.

MesquiteMan

Retired Head Moderator
Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
5,678
Location
San Marcos, TX, USA.
I have had numerous comments from members that they feel the religious tag lines in some signatures violate the AUP prohibitting discussion of religion or politics. I would like to get an idea of what the membership thinks. THIS IS NOT A DEMOCRATIC VOTE and Jeff and I will make the final decision! I just want to get a feel of what the membership thinks. Please only vote. I don't want this turning into a discussion of religious signature lines!
 
Last edited:
Signed-In Members Don't See This Ad

marcruby

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Messages
1,175
Location
Warren, Michigan, USA.
I had to think for a moment because I don't think 'strictly enforced' is exactly what I want. Then it occurred to me that you can't enforce it any way but strictly if you enforce it at all.

It's not that I find Christian slogans offensive, I just wonder what would happen if I suddenly took up using a Jewish slogan, or a Buddhist, or something controversial - like Muslim.

What is important to me is that IAP remains friendly 'neutral' territory where we can put out energy into arguing about how many coats of CA are really necessary.

Marc
 

rjwolfe3

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2008
Messages
8,352
Location
Mansfield, Ohio, USA.
Ah makes sense.

One other question:
Let's speculate that your belief is atheism or humanism and you use a quote from that viewpoint. If you decide to ban religious quotes, would you also ban quotes that offend religious people?

FYI - I am neither - just interested in both sides of the argument.
 

marcruby

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Messages
1,175
Location
Warren, Michigan, USA.
I would say yes -- I don't see a big difference between quotes on any side of that issue.

Marc

Ah makes sense.

One other question:
Let's speculate that your belief is atheism or humanism and you use a quote from that viewpoint. If you decide to ban religious quotes, would you also ban quotes that offend religious people?

FYI - I am neither - just interested in both sides of the argument.
 

MesquiteMan

Retired Head Moderator
Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
5,678
Location
San Marcos, TX, USA.
Rob,

You bring up a good point. If religious statements are allowed, then this statement would have to be allowed:

"Allah Akbar, Americans are infidels"

I know most would scream if that was posted as a signature line, even our non-American members.
 

les-smith

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Messages
1,158
Location
Oklahoma
What's next? Do we start banning/deleting any posts that request prayer. As long as the signature isn't disgusting or hateful I don't see why things can't be left alone.

I feel pretty confident that the individuals who are part of the "numerous comments from members" group that object to the religous tag lines in our signatures will pale in comparison to those that will object to the banning/removal of the relgious tags lines. And rightfully so IMHO.

I believe that the policy as it stands now and how it is being controlled serves its purpose. IMHO if you ban/remove the religous tag lines in the signatures I think you will be instituting a policy that a lot of members will find insupportable and unsupportable.
 
Last edited:

W3DRM

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
218
Location
Minden, NV, USA.
I really don't care one way or the other but I really wish all these posts were related to pen turning...

Think of all the energy being wasted just discussing this issue that most likely will never really be resolved.

I say let Jeff and Curtis handle the issues and the rest of us just have fun turning pens!
 

BruceK

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
379
Location
Ocean Park, Washington.
Ooh what a can of worms this one is.....

IMHO, What a person "believes" should be private and is not appropriate on a public forum which has members of many faiths. I respect everyone's right to what they belief but this is a pen turning website. Why should politics or religion enter into any of our conversations?

Believe in what you want, I'm turning pens.
 

igran7

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2006
Messages
1,066
Location
Clackamas, Oregon, USA.
Ooh what a can of worms this one is.....

IMHO, What a person "believes" should be private and is not appropriate on a public forum which has members of many faiths. I respect everyone's right to what they belief but this is a pen turning website. Why should politics or religion enter into any of our conversations?

Believe in what you want, I'm turning pens.


Well said!
 

Rudy Vey

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2004
Messages
2,032
Location
South Plainfield, NJ, USA.
Ooh what a can of worms this one is.....

IMHO, What a person "believes" should be private and is not appropriate on a public forum which has members of many faiths. I respect everyone's right to what they belief but this is a pen turning website. Why should politics or religion enter into any of our conversations?

Believe in what you want, I'm turning pens.

Very well said!!! Totally agree!!
 

GoodTurns

Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Messages
4,125
Location
Bowie, MD, USA.
Wow, just voted, looks like the poll is going to be a lot of help :wink: quite balanced at this point! Would MY tagline count as religeous? It is song lyrics based on biblical verse....
 

leehljp

Member Liaison
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
9,330
Location
Tunica, Mississippi,
What a person believes is Personal, but it is in not private. What they believe in (if it is good, or supposedly good) should reflect in who they are and the way that they express themselves - what ever faith or non faith system they believe in. That should not be suppressed. It is not private.


However, speaking of "private" - privately own companies and privately run organizations that are opened to the public (such as local mom and pop stores or larger privately owned stores) have a right to control such situations as they see fit. If religious pushing becomes overt and "in your face", then limits have to be set.

If it is merely "there" - but not "in your face", then a question of tolerance becomes the issue. It is "intolerance" that is rising its ugly head. "Community" will be the victim. Intolerance is the outcome, not silence, not private faith. Please note that there is a distinction between "being there" as visible in a tag line versus being "in your face" as a challenging statement.


Being a "non-believer of any faith" and pushing for the removal of "faith statements" is also just as aggressive, "in your face" and challenging. Intolerance is what that is, but it will probably win for the sake of peace.

But this is what happens when one "flaunts" their "beliefs" in an aggressive challenging manner. It becomes taken away for all - for the sake of peace. It might have to come to that. I hate to see it. The fact of this "thread" being here is a hint in that direction.


This theme makes it harder for our moderators, and will take its toll on them too - if only in future PMs.

Many of you have been into restaurants and even businesses that have a bulletin board that allows you to put a business card there. Religious, non-religious, advertising a competing business as well. We don't get upset at diverse business, religious organizations posting a business card there - and the establishment doesn't get up in arms and make an issue out of it either. We don't read all of them and if we do see one we don't like, we don't dwell on it or demand it be taken down, respectfully, we (well most of us) move on to the next. Why can't that be done here?


"Community" allows for diversity, or at least should. But if we don't police ourselves, leadership will have to.
 
Last edited:

Skye

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
3,487
Location
Rock Hill, SC
I think it's very simple.

Signatures are not part of the discussion, so they should be allowed.

Man, people's sensitivity levels here consistently amaze me. I come from a lot of forums. Gear heads, muscle heads, chopper builders, and I've never come across a group of people with such delicate and offendable sensibilities. It's amazing... in a bad way.
 

Dario

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2005
Messages
8,222
Location
Austin, TX, USA.
Man, people's sensitivity levels here consistently amaze me. I come from a lot of forums. Gear heads, muscle heads, chopper builders, and I've never come across a group of people with such delicate and offendable sensibilities. It's amazing... in a bad way.

I agree and seems like the whiners are winning (or whinning? :biggrin:).

I am sure someone will be offended by this ("personal attack") statement and will probably get me reported too. :frown:
 

skywizzard

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2009
Messages
351
Location
Canton, GA
I think the problem also becomes one of interpretation. For example when I selected my signature for this forum I never thought of it as having any religious implications, but after this thread I can see where some might think it does. I don't envy Curtis and Jeff's job of making that decision....
 

THarvey

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
2,087
Location
Anniston, AL, USA
I agree with Hank's comments. Personal beliefs are part of what makes individuals unique. Unique individuals associating together form a community.

If tag lines discribing an individual's preferences should be removed, then all tag lines should be banned (including those advertising websites).

I was equally struck by the tag line quoting George Orwell's "Animal Farm."

"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
from Animal Farm by George Orwell​

If only "religious" tag lines are considered off limits, does that not mean that non-believers would be considered more equal than believers?

I do not, for a minute, think that my tag line is going to change or influence someone's belief system. It is an expression of who I am and what I believe. Nothing more and nothing less.

At the same time...I am not so weak minded that someone else's tagline will influence what I believe and hold true.

If a tagline is abusive, defamitory or offensive to the general populas, then it should be banned. Otherwise, I think it sould be considered an expression of individual personality.

Just like any other member post, I have the option to read or not read anything here. There are some members, whose post I do not read, because I know I generally disagree with their statements. Excersing my right "not to read" does not in any way infringe on their right to post. Nor, does their post offend me, because I have chosen not to read it, anyway. Neither of our "rights" have been abused, and both of us remain happy.

Now, I suggest we have a collective cup of coffee :coffee: and go back to making beautiful pens together. After all, isn't that what brought us all here in the first place?

Tim
 

ed4copies

Local Chapter Manager
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Messages
24,528
Location
Racine, WI, USA.
I think it's very simple.

Signatures are not part of the discussion, so they should be allowed.

Man, people's sensitivity levels here consistently amaze me. I come from a lot of forums. Gear heads, muscle heads, chopper builders, and I've never come across a group of people with such delicate and offendable sensibilities. It's amazing... in a bad way.

Skye,

I tend to agree with your statement, up to the last line. The management of the IAP attempts to keep the forum a "friendly" place. Personally, I lobby for the "no corpses, no foul" - if there's a little bleeding - you'll heal. But, we (you and I and others who think this way) need to realize that Jeff is attempting to keep the atmosphere pleasant. The "motorcycle crowd" are less sensitive types, yes. And I, personally, enjoy a good debate - if you can't defend your politics and religion, people SHOULD challenge you. BUT, should that happen on a PENTURNERS site??? THAT is the heart of the question here. And that is NOT a bad thing.

Repeating a line I use often, "This is MY opinion, YOU are ENCOURAGED to have your own!!!"
 

Dario

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2005
Messages
8,222
Location
Austin, TX, USA.
Can't begin to express how impressed I am that everyone respected Curtis' wishes and refrained from posting comments!!!

LOL...I must be one of those who read and stop once I think I got everything already. Didn't even knew that line was there!!! :biggrin::redface:
 

TheGuy

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
9
Location
Columbia, SC
Freedom of Speech

If a tagline is abusive, defamitory or offensive to the general populas, then it should be banned. Otherwise, I think it sould be considered an expression of individual personality.
Tim

I am a BIG believer in the freedom of speech. In fact, even "if a tagline is abusive, defamitory or offensive to the general populas" it should be left alone. Either that, or ALL taglines should be banned. I am not offended by ANYTHING, including somebody trying to take my life.:eek: (Just allow me to defend myself). If they believe that I do not belong on this planet, that is their opinion/belief. I respect people for acting on their beliefs. Just respect me for acting on my own beliefs. :biggrin:
 

mrcook4570

Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
4,098
Location
Mason, WV, USA.
It's funny how a controversial topic will bring out the advocates of 'penturning only topics' yet nothing is ever said when someone posts a joke, vacation experiences, upcoming surgeries, death or illness in the family, loss of a pet, other turning, other forms of woodworking, and other trivial chatter.

I, personally, enjoy all aspects of this site. All of the similarities that we share and differences that we exhibit make us who we are and make this a fun and interesting place to visit. I enjoy learning who each person is. EVERY statement can be taken as a religious statement - it just depends on your point of view.

By censoring statements that reveal who a person is, that person becomes just an anonymous poster. And if you truly want 'penturning only topics' read the articles in the library. Ninety-nine percent of all penturning questions can be answered there without the need for comment or debate. The other one percent can be answered by reading texts in other fields (such as cutting threads) and using those techniques to make a pen.
 

Dario

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2005
Messages
8,222
Location
Austin, TX, USA.
It's funny how a controversial topic will bring out the advocates of 'penturning only topics' yet nothing is ever said when someone posts a joke, vacation experiences, upcoming surgeries, death or illness in the family, loss of a pet, other turning, other forms of woodworking, and other trivial chatter.

I, personally, enjoy all aspects of this site. All of the similarities that we share and differences that we exhibit make us who we are and make this a fun and interesting place to visit. I enjoy learning who each person is. EVERY statement can be taken as a religious statement - it just depends on your point of view.

By censoring statements that reveal who a person is, that person becomes just an anonymous poster. And if you truly want 'penturning only topics' read the articles in the library. Ninety-nine percent of all penturning questions can be answered there without the need for comment or debate. The other one percent can be answered by reading texts in other fields (such as cutting threads) and using those techniques to make a pen.

Good post Stan.

Yep, we won't need a forum if we cannot be a community. With it comes the good and the bad that exists in the real world.

As I mentioned countless times...I haven't turned in almost a year now. If this place is only for penturning topics...I would have vanished a long time ago (that may be a good thing for IAP though lol :tongue:)
 

TheGuy

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
9
Location
Columbia, SC
I apologize

D'oh... I too missed that.. Curtis should have 'Ed-ized' that part :)

I apologize for posting comments. I missed that as well. Moderator, I don't know how to erase my post (or if it is even possible here), but please do so for me if you wish.
 

Rarest wood

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2008
Messages
340
Location
Alnwick, Northumberland
Not the first part...Allahu Akbar just means 'God is great'....

But one could argue that the second part is a clear attack on members, which violates the AUP...

(I wasn't going to chime in, but you all started debating! :wink:)


The Actual meaning of "Allahu Akbar" is without doubt "Allah is Greater" which means in point of fact "Allah is greater than your God" is does not mean at all "God is Great". Now you will all know why it is used as the rallying cry of the muslim. I Just wanted to clear that up as it is so often misquoted here in the western world and its helpfull to have a clear understanding and to see where other world views are coming from. I am not a muslim myself.
 

les-smith

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Messages
1,158
Location
Oklahoma
Quote:
Originally Posted by MesquiteMan
Please only vote. I don't want this turning into a discussion of religious signature lines!


I apologize for posting comments. I missed that as well. Moderator, I don't know how to erase my post (or if it is even possible here), but please do so for me if you wish.

I'm going to go out on a limb here, I'm pretty sure I'm right, but I have been wrong in the paste. Crow doesn't taste all that bad. But, I don't see a need for some people to apologize for posting a reply because Curtis hadn't added that part before we posted. Please chime in Curtis if I'm wrong. Just don't want folks feeling bad that they did something wrong if they didn't.

Maybe we should delete this whole thread and do another duplicate poll without the option to reply. Then things can't get stirred up anymore. I think this one got stirred up before we were told not to reply and then it was to late. But really, this thread seems pretty tame compared to some that have got going in the past.
 
Signed-In Members Don't See This Ad

maxwell_smart007

Lead Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
6,711
Location
middle of nowhere in the great, white North
The Actual meaning of "Allahu Akbar" is without doubt "Allah is Greater" which means in point of fact "Allah is greater than your God" is does not mean at all "God is Great". Now you will all know why it is used as the rallying cry of the muslim. I Just wanted to clear that up as it is so often misquoted here in the western world and its helpfull to have a clear understanding and to see where other world views are coming from. I am not a muslim myself.

I'm just curious; why is it that you think it's misquoted? I've never heard your interpretation before...

Send me a PM when you get a chance...I'm interested.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom