![]() |
|
|||||||
| Advanced Pen Making Kit-less construction; designs and challenges beyond those normally associated with kit pens. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 13
Photos:
0
|
I'm going to start my first kitless or semi-kitless pen this weekend, and was wondering what thread pitch a few items were. I saw on another thread that the El Grande nib is 10x1. If anyone can confirm this, that would be great.
The other thing I'd like some confirmation on is the fountain and rollerball nib for a Woodcraft Navigator pen. I tried putting it into my tap/die set, and think it's a little smaller than 3/8x24. Before I go turning a blank and threading it, though, I'd like to know exactly so I don't mess everything up completely and waste my time. Is it possible to use a drill chuck rather than a collet chuck? I saw this post earlier, and was wondering if a drill chuck would be a suitable replacement (Just another way of making a pen). I have a drill chuck already, and the collet chuck is out of my price range right now. I also have the Arizona Silhouette closed end pen mandrels for the Navigator/Sedona and El Grande pens If that information helps. Thanks and cheers, Adam |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Confirm that the EL Grande nib is 10 x 1. Virtually all the cap threads on the kit pens are multi-start, so off the shelf taps and dies to replicate them are quite expensive. There have been a few groups buys, but the sets of 1 tap and 1 die are still about $200 in quantity. Many choose to start with single start and if you are doing both internal and external cap threads, it really doesn't matter if they match the kit, only that they fit one another. 12mm or 1/2 inch taps will work with a pen using the ElGrande nibs (which BTW can be purchased separately).
A drill chuck can work in the short term, but I would save up for the collet. The drill chucks are not designed for stressing in that direction and you will soon find your pens off center due to wear.
__________________
Bruce
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
I did my first kitless last month. For the nib section, the M10x1 to match the el-grande is what I used - seems a good choice. I choose to use the single start stadard threads for the cap. I used 1/2" 20 TPI. Works fine, but a M12x1 I think would be a better choice in a standard inexpensive tap/die. The 1/2 x 20 TPI is a bit course, and the diameter is a little big for the readily available tubes. The M12 is a bit smaller and should enable use of a smaller tube size, giving a bit more flexibility in design.
BTW, for comparison, the TPI on the M12x1 is about 25. For visual comparison in your set, it will be the same TPI as the M10x1. Based on past threads, the M10x.75 could be an option, but I haven't considered it becasue the local suppliers dont have it stock Disclaimer: I have not used the M12x1 -its just where I'm thinkng of going becasue teh tap/die is reasonable priced at a local supplier. IF someone more experienced can chime in, it would be great.
__________________
Dennis Cabell
Sterling Heights, MI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
I use the 12x.75 for the cap threads I make. Both the tap and die are available from victor machinery. they also carry 10mm in different pitches both taps and dies and they run about 10.00 each +/-.
http://www.victornet.com/ Mike Let me add that I started with 12x1 but the thread depth meant the material had to be thicker. I found the .75 was a comfortable range without having too many twists of the .5 pitch threads. Also a .75 works just fine with 2 threads for posting the cap.
__________________
Life occasionally offers us the opportunity to make very very hard choices, I have had such offers.
Mike http://www.silverpenparts.comLast edited by mredburn; 02-18-2011 at 07:53 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Quote:
I wouldn't let tube size compatability be a consideration when designing a pen and deciding on which thread sizes to select. Start thinking true kitless and your design possibilities soar!
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
George, that is where I started - using your tutorial thread from some time ago, but I was using PR (self cast), after several threading failures, I made a metal coupler and I decided the PR would not be strong enough on its own. Maybe I was just being over cautious. Either way, I think the 1/2 X 20 was ok for learning,but there are better options moving forward.
I agree the tubes limited my design, With a 1/2 tap, I had to go with a KS engineering 9/16 tube, which made the cap a little thicker than I would have perferred.
__________________
Dennis Cabell
Sterling Heights, MI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Quote:
If people really want to go kitless, then why not go 'unique' at the same time? If threads are a pain, then leave them off ![]() Here is a spring loaded bayonet type cap. The other thing that has my interest at the moment is that good modern rollerball refills don't dry out any more so caps are not needed unless for fountain pens, and there are even capless fp's out there too ![]() Why spend a ton of money and loads of effort to copy a kit pen design? ![]()
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| el grande , fountain , kitless , navigator , threading |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|