![]() |
|
|||||||
| Build the Tips, Tricks, & FAQ Files Have a tip, trick, or a Q&A for the FAQ? Post it here. |
|
Logged on members can hide ads!
|
Welcome to penturners.org!You've found the home of The International Association of Penturners. You are currently viewing our site as a guest, which gives you limited access to view discussions, photos, and library articles.Consider joining our community today. You'll have full access to all of our content, be able to enter our contests, find local chapters near you, and post your questions and share your experience with our members all over the world. Membership is completely free!! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Is this worthy of a tip/trick/FAQ?
Square Mould Turning Wastage The calculation for the amount of material wasted when turning a square moulded blank into a cylindrical shape yields a really surprising number. Here’s the science part: Assuming the desired cylindrical blank is the same length as the initial right cuboid moulded blank, the length can be disregarded for percentage wastage calculations. To calculate wastage when turning blanks of a given size down to resultant cylinders of a given diameter, we may use the following simple equations: b = s^2Where: s is the length of side of the square section of the right cuboid moulding.Example We start with a right cuboid moulding 22mm of square side. We aim to turn this into a cylindrical blank of 15mm diameter. The cross sectional area of the initial blank is b = 22^2 = 484mm^2The cross sectional area of the cylinder is c = π (15 / 2)2 = 177mm^2This is a wastage of w = (484 - 177) / 484 * 100 = 63%This is pretty staggering. Even for a blank of 15mm sides (the bear minimum) and wanting to turn this down to a 12mm slimline, we still lose a massive 50% of the initial material. Conclusion Using circular moulds as small as possible where we can is likely to save at least 50% on the raw casting compound and increase the amount of use we get from the cutting tool before re-sharpening! Last edited by KDM; 05-23-2010 at 02:49 AM. Reason: The superscripted 2's looked OK when I typed them but when I submitted, they weren't superscript. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Further Thoughts on Waste From Centre Drilling
Centre drilling the blank produces even more waste. To take into account the waste from centre drilling, the equations given above are extended / modified as follows: b = s^2Where: s is the length of side of the square section of the right cuboid moulding.Example We start with a right cuboid moulding 22mm of square side. We aim to turn this into a cylindrical blank of 15mm diameter with a 7mm centre hole. The cross sectional area of the initial blank is as before b = 22^2 = 484mm^2 The cross sectional area of the cylinder with the hole cut out is c = π ((15 / 2)^2 - (7 / 2)^2)= 138mm^2 This is a wastage of w = (484 - 138) / 484 * 100 = 71% In the example of the blank of 15mm sides turned down to 12mm with a 7mm hole, this is a loss of 67% of the material. Conclusion Using circular moulds as small as possible with the centre hole moulded into the blank is likely to save at least 65% on the raw casting compound and increase the longevity of your drill bit and chisel. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|