Tiger
Member
I have read through a number of posts on this forum regarding the difficulty of aligning the headstock and the tailstock. I use a dead centre in the headstock and a live centre in the tailstock. With some paper shims under the tailstock I get pretty close to perfect alignment, yet I still get some out of round/eccentric results with my pen barrels. The diameter of the barrels are consistent just the centre is slightly off. Now I cleaned the morse tapers and that gave me a little more accuracy. The dial indicator shows less than a thousandth inch run-out with the dead centre in place, the tailstock is approx 1 to 1.5 thousandths out. I still get less than a perfect result with eccentricity but I'd like to ask whether I am expecting too much. The resulting eccentricity is small. If you run your finger from pen part to barrel you barely notice a difference, if you run your fingernail in a perpendicular direction across the pen part and the barrel you certainly notice the uneven transition. It is not easy to notice the transition but if you know it's there, you'll find it easily enough. Now we can rule out bad bushings as I turn without them and turn BTC, the eccentricity seems to always be at the tailstock end and the lathe is a Jet 10 x 14 Variable speed. These are wood lathes and not metal lathes, I understand that. I just want to know, the pen turners who accept that these lathes are not high precision bits of equipment, can you get perfectly seamless transitions between your pen parts and barrels or is it unachievable with this sort of equipment? Other option is I keep spending lots of time trying to get perfect alignment which I'm not sure is even going to guarantee the perfect consistent transition that I desire.