Gary
Member
I've seen reference here to the Beall Collet Chuck system being demonstrably better than the Morse Taper for holding the pen mandrel. Could sombody please clarify why this would be the case?
With the Morse Taper, the mandrel is threaded into a piece of steel and held securely. With the Beall system is simply held securely by the collet. It would seem to me that any "whip" would be the same since that is a function of that part of the mandrel that extends beyond the point of hold. What am I missing?
With the Morse Taper, the mandrel is threaded into a piece of steel and held securely. With the Beall system is simply held securely by the collet. It would seem to me that any "whip" would be the same since that is a function of that part of the mandrel that extends beyond the point of hold. What am I missing?